Equality and Achievement

In recent decades, significant deliberation has taken place regarding whether individual achievement thrives more in egalitarian or hierarchical societies. In my perspective, despite the merits of egalitarianism as a political principle, it should not be pursued as an all-encompassing social ideal.

Advocates of egalitarian societies emphasize the advantages of equal opportunities. Illustrative instances can be found in socialist nations like France, where income disparity is less pronounced compared to more capitalist countries. In such liberal societies, individuals have access to quality education, secure employment, unemployment benefits during economic downturns, and contribute to the welfare of the broader community through higher tax rates. Being part of such a cohesive social fabric serves as a motivating factor for individuals to excel in their endeavors and pursue their life aspirations. Moreover, the absence of anxiety about being left behind by society at large further propels individuals towards success.

However, I contend that in conditions of relative equality, individuals should be allowed to compete without excessive government intervention. A prime example of this scenario can be observed in the United States. While income inequality poses challenges, the country also fosters greater innovation across various sectors. One contributing factor is the motivation derived from the desire to excel and reap the financial rewards that accompany achievement. This impetus encourages individuals to strive for their own interpretation of success, as failure to do so might result in social marginalization.

In conclusion, although competition entails certain harsh aspects, it remains the most effective catalyst for fostering innovation and overall societal growth at both individual and collective levels. Of course, this approach can only be pursued once systemic issues related to discrimination have been effectively addressed.