Criminal Treatment

There are advocates today who assert that authorities should treat adults and young individuals equally in the criminal justice system. From my perspective, despite the apparent fairness associated with this viewpoint, it overlooks significant psychological distinctions.

Supporters of equal treatment argue that it would yield a greater deterrent effect. The primary purpose of punishing individuals in society is not solely for the sake of justice but also to dissuade others from committing similar crimes. Young people receive education both in schools and in society, emphasizing the notion that actions carry consequences and that crimes are met with imprisonment and other penalties. If these sanctions are diminished, the logical inference is that the likelihood of young individuals engaging in criminal behavior would increase, even if the overall number of young offenders is currently lower than ever before.

However, age serves as a crucial mitigating factor. Adults who commit crimes have had more time to develop socially and intellectually, whereas young individuals may not fully comprehend the ramifications of their choices on themselves and others. For instance, there have been recent instances where young people have been influenced by extremist elements prevalent on social media platforms. In such circumstances, young individuals are more susceptible to external influences and often lack the confidence and maturity to think independently. This vulnerability extends to their emotional and intellectual growth, warranting laws that safeguard young people from disproportionately severe sentences.

In conclusion, although there are practical arguments supporting equal punishment for all age groups, implementing such a change would be unjust towards young individuals. Courts should consider a range of factors before determining an appropriate punishment.